The different definitions of health and fitness health indicate that it can certainly be motivated around the basis of both aim and very subjective measures . Often, inside the workplace, it’s motivated around the basis of medical biometric actions including BMI (body mass index), weight, blood pressure, cholesterol levels and also blood sugar levels level. These objective measures are derived from a process usually called biometric assessment.

Since health and fitness state is able to entail very subjective data and each objective, knowing these different information points is crucial.

Very subjective Data Sources

• Biographical information

• Physical symptoms

• Past health and fitness history

• Family history

• Health opinions as well as values

• Lifestyle

Unbiased Data Sources

• Physical characteristics

• Appearance

• Health, way of life and also other behaviors

• Body devices functioning

• Measurements and also screening results

• Results from laboratory testing

Since there is simply no standard for health status, it could be based upon either subjective or objective information. Typically however, present techniques are concentrated nearly entirely on the influences of illness and the different states of ill health.

Exactly how people conceptualize the health and wellbeing of theirs has been proven to vary as a performance of:

• Age and gender

• Social class

• Culture

This means that how they see their wellness state will vary as well. Since the conceptualization can differ, it is essential to come up with the assessment about the private personnel as a complete individual but not just concerning their current biometric data. It means that the staff has to be seen in the various contexts that can and will influence their health and not in the same way an isolated individual. A highly effective wellbeing research demands a contextual consciousness and understanding in addition to observing and understanding any objective measurement and evaluation benefits.

Despite the worksite wellness community’s heavy reliance on independent steps as signs of health and fitness, I discovered it interesting to check out that in this article “self-assessed wellbeing contributed considerably to the prediction of mortality, even with controlling for a wide array of objective health and wellbeing indicators.” (Wright, 1977)

In the publication of his, Healing Beyond the Body, Dr. Larry Dossey published: “Our unique viewpoint about the state of the health of ours is an even better predictor than actual physical signs or symptoms and also objective things like comprehensive exams, lab tests or maybe behaviors.” Dr. Dossey also authored that the best way men and women respond to the question “Is the health of yours exceptional, good, reasonable, or maybe poor is a better predictor of who’ll live or perish over the next decade than in-depth physical exams, and intensive laboratory tests.”

The quotes by Dossey and Wright are particularly note worthy with the worksite wellness community’s major marketing of place of work biometric screening results for being signs of an employee’s health condition. Given that health might be determined in extremely broad conceptual health and words and phrases condition can be very very subjective also, it may behoove the worksite health group to take a look at its existing method of wellness getting constrained to merely individual staff wellness condition that is grounded on biometrics and also health threat assessments.

In the event it involves the condition of an employee’s health, the worksite health community will be a good idea to look beyond only the results of biometric screenings.


Dossey, Larry. MD. 2001. Healing Beyond The Body. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

Wright, Stephen. 1997. Health Status Assessment in Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Medicine and Health. Baum, Andre. Newman, Stanton. Weinman, John. West, Robert. McManus, Chris. (Eds.) New York: Cambridge University Press.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *